Should The New York Times Ditch Paper, Distribute Kindle E-readers? | Technomix | Fast Company

Posted using ShareThis

An interesting proposal, to say the least. NYT gives away the Kindle to readers as a way to wean the paper off of … well … paper.

But can it be that much more cost prohibitive? Given the price of newsprint, ink, presses, the waste created by the printing process, the costs of gas, insurance, and trucks to deliver the product, is it that much more expensive than what we’re doing now?

Frankly, this is the way newspapers should be going. Maybe Kindle is not the answer, but it is a good start. If we look at the business model of the wireless phone industry – practically give the hardware away, then charge for for personalized and premium services – we may be able to craft out a business plan that may actually bring in some money.

Any takers out there?


One thought on “

  1. I listen to the audio version of the NY times weekdays, and get the rest of the news online.My friend told me the other day that although she subscribes to the newspaper, she doesn’t read it and get her news online.Keep in mind I live in Pennslytucky, and the newspapers are just not that good. The article are hard to understand sometimes. Don’t believe me? Check it out. or


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s